Quote
"This is a really good example of why you never put racism up to a popular vote, because racism will win every time,” she said. “It’s not up to the offending class to say what offends the offended."

Susan Shown Harjo, quoted in “US Poll Finds Widespread Support for Redskins Name” by Ben Nuckols, Associated Press (http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory/us-poll-finds-widespread-support-redskins-19092814?page=2)

(Source: heatdeath, via marfmellow)

Photo
thepanduchessofshade:

bana05:


One of the myths of the game is that Robinson was chosen by Rickey because of his forbearance, his ability to absorb slurs without hitting back.
To anyone who knew him, the notion of Jackie Robinson turning the other cheek, putting up with insults, was laughable. I have never been able to find one veteran chronicler of the early Robinson days who remembers Jackie being anything but truculent and unbending in the face of slurs and insults.
Jackie made sure you treated him as a man. He didn’t suffer fools gladly. … He was as deeply suspicious of the flatterers as he was the bigots.
 Jackie wore no man’s collar. Ever. Long before Rosa Parks, he had refused to move to the back of the bus—in the Army. He was court-martialed. He was acquitted.
I remember once, in a kind of confidential exchange I had with him, I was brash enough to suggest incautiously, “But, Jackie, on the whole, wasn’t there less bigotry and intolerance out there than you expected?”
Jackie fixed me with a glare.
“There shouldn’t have been any,” he said sternly.
You never argued with Jackie Robinson. He made America live up to its promises. [x]

Boom.

welp

thepanduchessofshade:

bana05:

One of the myths of the game is that Robinson was chosen by Rickey because of his forbearance, his ability to absorb slurs without hitting back.

To anyone who knew him, the notion of Jackie Robinson turning the other cheek, putting up with insults, was laughable. I have never been able to find one veteran chronicler of the early Robinson days who remembers Jackie being anything but truculent and unbending in the face of slurs and insults.

Jackie made sure you treated him as a man. He didn’t suffer fools gladly. … He was as deeply suspicious of the flatterers as he was the bigots.

Jackie wore no man’s collar. Ever. Long before Rosa Parks, he had refused to move to the back of the bus—in the Army. He was court-martialed. He was acquitted.

I remember once, in a kind of confidential exchange I had with him, I was brash enough to suggest incautiously, “But, Jackie, on the whole, wasn’t there less bigotry and intolerance out there than you expected?”

Jackie fixed me with a glare.

“There shouldn’t have been any,” he said sternly.

You never argued with Jackie Robinson. He made America live up to its promises. [x]

Boom.

welp

(via nowherezone11)

Link

mer-bitch:

aboutthinprivilege:

aboutthinprivilege:

I really love all cats: aboutthinprivilege: mer-bitch: When thin people derail fat discussions…

aboutthinprivilege:

mer-bitch:

When thin people derail fat discussions and/or claim that thin oppression/fat privilege is real, can we call it…

If we’re keeping score, I’m technically more oppressed than you are, I was just being considerate since I know how you feel. No wonder fat people feel so isolated.

Wait, what?

There’s no scorecard for oppression, douchebag.

LOL

“technically I’m more oppressed than you”

“technically”

cool I’m glad you’re keeping track. Now wait, are you more oppressed than me because you’re thin *and* fat? Is that your logic? Because I’m fat *and* queer *and* Jewish if we want all the cards on the table…

(via maritimebitch-deactivated201305)

Photo
grrlyman:

lovewallace:

casual-isms:

Presented without comment, because I’m sure someone will be able to find the words better than I can.




oh look we have cute doodles too

A++

grrlyman:

lovewallace:

casual-isms:

Presented without comment, because I’m sure someone will be able to find the words better than I can.

oh look we have cute doodles too

A++

Quote
"I don’t expect gay people to prove to me, a straight person, that there’s actually homophobia. I don’t expect poor people to prove to me, a Harvard grad, that hunger and poverty are widespread problems. And if someone asked me, as an Asian person, to “prove” to them that racism exists, I would laugh all the way back to Chinatown. Marginalized groups are not responsible for explaining their marginalization to you. If you are actually concerned, you would take the initiative to do some research yourself instead of showing up at some oppressed group’s door step demanding a list of citations for things (racism, sexism, etc.) that are proven time and time again in the real world."

WORD (via notevenbovvered)

(Source: amberlrhea, via grrlyman)

Link

ayoungladysillustratedprimer:

Go to The Political Notebook for some great back reading on VAWA.

(via smellslikegirlriot)

Text

gynocraticgrrl:

I never was able to comprehend the idea that abuse survivors lie about their experiences for attention.

Is our benefit the perception that we are broken and cannot function properly within the society? Is our benefit continuously being told that our mistreatment was incited by something we did, that our suffering is our fault and not that of our abusers? Is our benefit being told that we exaggerate our experiences and are delusional? Is our benefit having people believe we are doing it for attention because we live in a culture that both vilifies and idolizes trauma vics., personality disorders, mental illness, etc, as being something inhuman and edgy? Is our benefit being failed by a justice system that allows the majority of rapists free to continue living their lives “normally” while we are rewarded with the labels of “whore”, “slut” and “liar”?

There is nothing to emotionally or socially gain through being abused.

Seriously.  But I guess some guys want to be able to “save” girls, so then girls want to be broken so they can be saved.  It’s especially good if another guy broke her, so this new guy can be a Super Nice Guy and undo all the evil that the original guy did.  And since guys want to save us, they suspect that we girls want to make them want to save us.  So then we’d lie about abuse?  Seriously I think it all comes back to men thinking it’s all about them, and us wanting them.

Hint: it’s not about you.  This time it’s actually about us.  We’re survivors.  It has nothing to do with you.  Except for the fact that, by being a man, you not only are a member of the group that abuses us, but you are exempt from that abuse, and benefit from it.  Other than that… it has nothing to do with you.

Text

Weeding out Followers

femmefrustration:

  • Racism against white people doesn’t exist
  • Sexism against men doesn’t exist
  • Oppression of cis people doesn’t exist
  • Oppression of thin people doesn’t exist
  • Oppression of able people doesn’t exist
  • Oppression of straight people doesn’t exist
  • Oppression of rich people doesn’t exist
  • Speciesism doesn’t exist
  • The ‘War on Christianity’ doesn’t exist
  • No white ppl, you can’t wear that war bonnet (or bindi, or sugar skull make-up, or locs)
  • People are allowed to be angry and react to abuse violently
  • People are allowed to have safe spaces, and when someone infringes upon that space, they are harassing you

(added what’s in parentheses)

(via drpepperslonelyheartsclubband)

Text

mysandri:

matriarch-aethyta:

You can disagree with somebody about politics

AND NOT HATE THEM

yeah if the issue is whether a new ordinance should be passed on the color of houses or sth

if its anything that oppresses, injures, and/or denies basic rights then yeah I’ll hate people who support it

“politics” aren’t just fun ideas to debate over and then go home and have no consequences…unless you’re a rich white dude maybe

(Source: keelah-kawaii, via )

Photo
shakethecobwebs:

rebloggable by request

shakethecobwebs:

rebloggable by request